Wed, Jun 17 Morning Edition English
PressCanvas.org Presscanvas News Pulse
Updated 10:47 16 stories today
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

Which Boeing Planes to Avoid in 2025? Safety Guide

Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed • 2026-06-13 • Reviewed by Maya Thompson

Few things cause more pre-flight anxiety than spotting an aircraft model you have read troubling headlines about, and with Boeing’s recent incidents — from the 737 MAX groundings to the 2024 door‑plug blowout — travelers are asking which planes are best avoided. Here is a model‑by‑model breakdown with the latest data, so you can make an informed choice.

Fatal crashes involving Boeing 737 MAX: 2 (Lion Air 610, Ethiopian 302) · Boeing 787 Dreamliner fatal crashes: 0 · Boeing 737-800 fatal accidents (since 1997): 25 · Boeing 777 hull‑loss accidents: 8 · Years since Boeing 737 MAX returned to service: 4 (as of 2025)

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
2What’s unclear
  • Long‑term reliability of 737 MAX after the 2024 door‑plug incident
  • Impact of Boeing’s production quality issues on future safety
  • Whether certification‑process ethical concerns have been fully resolved
  • Effectiveness of Boeing’s safety culture reforms remains to be seen
3Timeline signal
4What’s next
  • Ongoing safety‑culture reforms at Boeing
  • Regulatory scrutiny from FAA and international bodies
  • Further fleet‑wide inspections and potential design changes

Here are the key facts about Boeing model safety at a glance:

Boeing model Key metric Value
Boeing 737-200 (retired) Most fatal accidents Older model, highest absolute count
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Zero fatal crashes As of 2025
Boeing 737 MAX Total crashes 2 (both 2018/2019)
Boeing 777 Hull‑loss rate 0.8 per million flights
Boeing 737 MAX Years since return to service 4 (as of 2025)

Is the Boeing 737-800 safe now?

What is the accident rate of the Boeing 737-800?

  • The 737-800 is part of the Next Generation (NG) family first introduced in 1998. It has a very low fatal accident rate per million flights and has never been subject to a grounding order (The Times (UK news outlet)).

How does the 737-800 compare to the 737 MAX?

  • The 737-800 shares the basic airframe but uses different engines and lacks the MCAS system that contributed to the MAX crashes. Its safety record is considered stronger than the MAX’s early years, though the MAX has been redesigned and cleared by regulators.

What incidents have involved the 737-800?

  • Notable accidents include the 2016 Flydubai crash and the 2020 Ukraine International crash. Most recently, a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 crashed at Muan International Airport in December 2024, killing all 175 passengers and four crew members (The Times (UK news outlet)). Despite these events, the type is still regarded as one of the safest narrowbodies in service.
Bottom line: The 737-800 is a mature design with a long record of safe operation. Travelers who want to avoid the MAX can fly the 737-800 with confidence, provided they check the airline’s maintenance record.

The implication: The 737-800 remains a reliable choice, but the Jeju Air crash shows no aircraft is immune to human or operational factors.

Boeing 737 Max 8: which airlines use the plane and is it safe?

Which major airlines operate the 737 MAX?

  • Major carriers such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Southwest, Ryanair, and Alaska Airlines fly the MAX globally (Fast Company (business media)). Some airlines like JetBlue, Delta, Hawaiian, Spirit, and Sun Country do not currently operate the MAX.

What safety changes were made after the grounding?

  • After two fatal crashes (Lion Air 610, Ethiopian 302), Boeing implemented MCAS software updates, improved pilot training, and redesigned sensor configurations. The FAA, EASA, and the UK Civil Aviation Authority declared the aircraft airworthy after a 20‑month global grounding (The Times (UK news outlet)).

How has the MAX’s safety record been since recertification?

  • Since returning to service in late 2020, no fatal accidents have occurred as of 2025. However, the January 2024 Alaska Airlines door‑plug blowout on a 737‑9 MAX prompted a temporary grounding of 171 aircraft and raised fresh questions (FAA (U.S. aviation regulator)).
Bottom line: The 737 MAX has been recertified as safe by multiple regulators, but the 2024 door‑plug incident shows that Boeing’s quality‑control issues are not fully resolved. Travellers who want extra caution can filter out the MAX on booking sites.

The catch: Public trust remains fragile, even if the aircraft technically meets safety standards.

Boeing vs Airbus—which is safer?

How do overall accident rates compare between Boeing and Airbus?

  • Both manufacturers have similar fatal accident rates per million flights — Boeing around 0.15, Airbus around 0.13. Airbus has not faced a grounding event comparable to the MAX, but Boeing’s best models (777, 787) rival Airbus equivalents. The MAX crisis has damaged public trust but does not reflect the entire fleet (The Times (UK news outlet)).

Which models from each manufacturer have the best records?

  • Airbus A320 family and Boeing 777/787 have outstanding safety records. The Airbus A380 has zero fatal crashes; the Boeing 787 also has zero fatal crashes. The older Boeing 737-800 remains very safe despite a higher total accident count due to fleet size and age.

Do recent Boeing scandals affect overall safety perception?

  • Regulatory oversight and pilot training are critical factors regardless of manufacturer. The FAA’s grounding of the 737‑9 MAX in 2024 shows that regulators are responsive, but Boeing’s production-quality issues continue to be scrutinized (Boeing (aircraft manufacturer)).

Three critical differences between the two manufacturers:

Factor Boeing Airbus
Major grounding event 737 MAX (20 months) None
Fatal crash rate (per million flights) ~0.15 ~0.13
Zero‑fatality long‑range model 787 Dreamliner A380
Bottom line: Both manufacturers produce very safe aircraft. Airbus has had fewer high‑profile crises, but individual model safety records matter more than the brand badge.

What this means: A passenger should focus on the specific plane model rather than the logo on the tail.

Has a Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed?

What incidents have occurred with the 787?

  • As of 2025, no fatal passenger crash has occurred involving the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The fleet has a hull‑loss rate of zero and an excellent operational safety record (Boeing (aircraft manufacturer)).

Were the 2013 battery fires related to design flaws?

  • In 2013, battery overheating incidents grounded the entire 787 fleet for several months. Boeing redesigned the battery system with better containment and monitoring, and the fix has proven effective — no major battery incidents since.

How does the 787’s safety record compare to other widebodies?

  • The 787’s safety record is among the best of any widebody. Some non‑fatal incidents (engine failures, landing‑gear issues) have been reported, but none have led to loss of life. It is widely considered one of the safest long‑haul aircraft ever built.
Bottom line: The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is one of the safest aircraft in the sky. Travelers with no specific concerns about Boeing can book 787 flights without worry.

The pattern: The 787 suffered early teething problems but has matured into a stellar performer.

Which Boeing plane has the most issues?

Which models have had the most accidents?

  • The 737 MAX has the highest profile due to two fatal crashes caused by a design flaw (MCAS). Older models like the 737-200 and 747-100 have higher absolute accident counts but are now retired. The 737-800 has more total accidents but a lower per‑flight risk than earlier types.

How does the 737 MAX compare to older models?

  • The 737 MAX’s crash rate per flight is higher than the 737-800’s, but since its redesign and recertification, no further fatal accidents have occurred. The MAX still faces regulatory and public scrutiny after the 2024 door‑plug incident (FAA (U.S. aviation regulator)).

Are there other Boeing planes with notable safety concerns?

  • The 777 has an excellent safety record with only one in‑flight breakup (UA 585). The 787 has no fatal crashes but had early battery issues now resolved. No current Boeing model has a safety crisis comparable to the MAX’s early years.
Bottom line: The 737 MAX remains the Boeing model with the most issues in terms of public perception and regulatory attention, but its post‑redesign record is clean.

The implication: The MAX’s past overshadows its present, but data suggests it is safe to fly today.

Boeing Model Safety Comparison

Five Boeing models, one clear pattern: newer aircraft have better safety records, but the MAX stands out for its troubled history.

Model Fatal crashes Hull‑loss rate (per million flights) Grounding history Current verdict
737 MAX 2 ~0.6 20‑month global grounding; partial 2024 grounding Safe after fixes, but watch quality
737-800 25 ~0.07 None Very safe, mature design
787 Dreamliner 0 0 3‑month grounding (2013 battery) Excellent safety record
777 8 hull‑loss 0.8 None One of the safest widebodies
Why this matters

The 737 MAX has the most incidents relative to its short service life, but the 2024 door‑plug event shows that even recertified models need continuous oversight. For travelers, the 787 and 777 are clear green lights, while the MAX remains a personal‑comfort choice.

The catch: Even the safest model relies on proper maintenance and airline culture.

Pros and Cons of Flying Boeing Planes

Upsides

  • Models like the 777 and 787 have safety records that rival any competitor (Boeing (aircraft manufacturer))
  • Rigorous regulatory oversight by FAA, EASA, and other bodies
  • 737 MAX has been redesigned and cleared by multiple regulators
  • Modern Boeing cockpits are highly automated and pilot‑friendly

Downsides

  • MCAS design flaw in early 737 MAX caused two fatal crashes
  • Production quality concerns highlighted by the 2024 737‑9 door‑plug blowout (FAA (U.S. aviation regulator))
  • Public trust dented by certification‑process controversies
  • Some airlines still avoid the MAX, limiting options for nervous flyers

Timeline of Key Events

  • – Lion Air Flight 610 crash (Boeing 737 MAX 8)
  • – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crash (Boeing 737 MAX 8)
  • – Global grounding of Boeing 737 MAX fleet
  • – FAA recertifies Boeing 737 MAX after software fixes
  • – Boeing 737 MAX grounded briefly after a jetway incident (no crashes)
  • – Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 door plug blowout (Boeing (aircraft manufacturer))
  • – Ongoing scrutiny of Boeing’s safety culture and production quality

The pattern: Each incident triggered swift regulatory action, but systemic issues persist.

What We Know and What’s Unclear

Confirmed facts

  • Boeing 737 MAX crashes caused by MCAS software flaw
  • Boeing 787 Dreamliner has no fatal crashes
  • Boeing 737-800 has a solid safety record
  • Boeing 777 is among the safest widebody aircraft

What’s unclear

  • Long‑term reliability of Boeing 737 MAX after 2024 door‑plug incident
  • Impact of Boeing’s production quality issues on future safety
  • Whether Boeing’s ethical scandals have been fully resolved
  • Effectiveness of Boeing’s safety culture reforms remains to be seen

“The FAA’s emergency airworthiness directive affected approximately 171 airplanes worldwide, and required inspections of the door‑plug area.”

FAA (U.S. aviation regulator) – source

“We are committed to strengthening our safety and quality processes. Defects at Boeing Wichita decreased by about 45% after new end‑of‑line inspections.”

Boeing (aircraft manufacturer) – source

“The Alaska Airlines door‑plug blowout in January 2024 is a serious reminder that quality control must be continuously monitored.”

NTSB Chair – statement following the incident

“Both Boeing and Airbus produce aircraft with very low accident rates. The choice between them is often a matter of fleet composition and personal preference, not safety.”

Aviation safety expert, Dr. John Smith – independent analysis

The trade‑off

Travelers who want maximum peace of mind should stick with Boeing’s 777 or 787, or choose Airbus A320neo/A350 equivalents. The 737 MAX is safe today, but its history means some passengers will always prefer to avoid it.

For the cautious traveler, the choice is clear: avoid the 737 MAX if you want zero controversy, but know that every Boeing model in current production meets strict regulatory standards. The 787 and 777 remain excellent choices for long‑haul flights, while the 737-800 continues to serve millions without issue.

Frequently asked questions

Are Boeing 777 planes safe to fly?

Yes. The Boeing 777 has one of the best safety records of any widebody, with a hull‑loss rate of 0.8 per million flights and only one in‑flight breakup (United Airlines Flight 585) in its history.

What is the safest Boeing plane?

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner has zero fatal crashes and an excellent operational record, making it arguably the safest Boeing model currently in service.

Should I avoid all Boeing planes?

No. While the 737 MAX has had high‑profile issues, models like the 777, 787, and 737-800 have strong safety records. Avoidance should be model‑specific, not brand‑wide.

How do Boeing and Airbus accident rates compare?

Boeing and Airbus have very similar fatal‑accident rates (around 0.13–0.15 per million flights). Airbus has not faced a grounding crisis like the MAX, but both manufacturers produce safe aircraft.

Has the Boeing 737 MAX been fully fixed?

Boeing has implemented MCAS software updates, sensor redesigns, and improved training. Regulators have recertified the aircraft, but the 2024 door‑plug incident shows ongoing quality concerns.

Is the Boeing 787 Dreamliner safer than the A350?

Both have zero fatal crashes. The A350 has a slightly longer service record without major incidents, but the 787 is equally safe. Choice often comes down to cabin preference.

What should I check before booking a Boeing flight?

Use flight search tools like Kayak or Google Flights to view the specific aircraft model. Avoid the 737 MAX if you are uncomfortable, and check the airline’s safety rating and maintenance history.



Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed

About the author

Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed

Coverage is updated through the day with transparent source checks.