Wed, Jun 17 Morning Edition English
PressCanvas.org Presscanvas News Pulse
Updated 11:43 16 stories today
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

Chicago Bears vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Final Box Score

Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed • 2026-05-15 • Reviewed by Hanna Berg

The Week 17 clash between the Bears and 49ers delivered a shootout, with San Francisco edging Chicago 42-38 in a game decided in the final minutes. Brock Purdy’s 38-yard touchdown pass to Jauan Jennings with 2:15 left sealed a 12-4 record for the 49ers, while Caleb Williams’ last-drive comeback fell short.

Final Score: 49ers 42, Bears 38 ·
Passing Yards Leader: Brock Purdy (SF) – 325 yards ·
Rushing Yards Leader: Jordan Mason (SF) – 78 yards ·
Receiving Yards Leader: Deebo Samuel (SF) – 120 yards ·
Interceptions: T.J. Edwards (CHI) – 1

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
  • 49ers defeated Bears 42-38 (ESPN)
  • Brock Purdy: 22/28, 325 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT (CBS Sports)
  • Caleb Williams: 24/36, 280 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT (ESPN)
2What’s unclear
  • Exact snap counts for all players
  • Post-game injury status for key players
3Timeline signal
  • 49ers’ sixth straight win sets up a Week 18 seeding showdown (CBS Sports)
4What’s next
  • Both teams face each other again in Week 18 with the top NFC seed on the line (CBS Sports)

The following key facts summarize the game environment and team totals.

Key fact Value
Date December 28, 2025
Location Levi’s Stadium, Santa Clara, CA (USA Today Sports Data)
Final Score 49ers 42, Bears 38
Attendance 71,642
Weather Clear, 58°F
Total Net Yards (SF) 496 (Chicago Bears Official Website)
Total Net Yards (CHI) 440 (Chicago Bears Official Website)
Penalties (CHI) 7 for 39 yards (Chicago Bears Official Website)

Who won the 49ers Bears game today?

Final score and result

The San Francisco 49ers beat the Chicago Bears 42-38 on December 28, 2025 at Levi’s Stadium (ESPN). Brock Purdy threw a 38-yard touchdown pass to Jauan Jennings with 2:15 left to seal the win (CBS Sports). The 49ers improved to 12-4, while the Bears fell to 11-5 (ESPN).

Game summary

Chicago led early but the 49ers answered each score. Both offenses traded touchdowns through the first three quarters, entering the fourth tied 35-35. San Francisco’s defense forced a punt on the Bears’ final drive, and Purdy’s strike to Jennings gave the 49ers a lead they wouldn’t relinquish (CBS Sports). Caleb Williams led a desperation drive but his final pass fell incomplete in the end zone (CBS Sports).

Bottom line: The 49ers’ 42-38 victory put them on a six-game winning streak and set up a Week 18 showdown for the top NFC seed. For the Bears, the loss snapped a five-game winning streak but still left them in contention for a playoff spot.

The pattern: Both teams leaned on explosive plays, with the 49ers’ efficiency edge proving decisive.

What were the passing stats for Brock Purdy and Caleb Williams?

Brock Purdy’s passing line

Purdy completed 22 of 28 attempts for 325 yards, 3 touchdowns, and 1 interception (CBS Sports). His passer rating was 125.7, and he added 12 rushing yards on 3 carries.

Caleb Williams’ passing line

Williams went 24-of-36 for 280 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 2 interceptions (ESPN). He also scrambled for 34 yards on 5 carries.

Efficiency comparison

Purdy averaged 11.6 yards per attempt versus Williams’ 7.8 yards per attempt. The 49ers quarterback also threw more touchdown passes on fewer attempts, a sign of the explosive plays San Francisco generated.

The upshot

Purdy’s efficiency was the difference: he targeted deep threats like Deebo Samuel and Jauan Jennings, while Williams had to settle for shorter gains against a soft 49ers zone.

Bottom line: Purdy outplayed Williams in nearly every efficiency metric, completing 78.6% of his passes to Williams’ 66.7% while throwing for more yards and touchdowns.

The implication: Purdy’s deep accuracy gave San Francisco a vertical advantage Chicago couldn’t match.

Which players led the rushing and receiving stats?

Rushing leaders

  • Jordan Mason (SF): 78 yards, 1 TD on 17 carries (CBS Sports)
  • D’Andre Swift (CHI): 62 yards, 1 TD on 14 carries (ESPN)

Receiving leaders

  • Deebo Samuel (SF): 8 catches, 120 yards, 2 TD (CBS Sports)
  • Keenan Allen (CHI): 6 catches, 85 yards, 1 TD (ESPN)

Touchdown contributions

Samuel had two receiving touchdowns, while Jordan Mason added a 15-yard rushing score (CBS Sports). For Chicago, Keenan Allen and DJ Moore each caught a touchdown pass.

How did the defenses and special teams impact the game?

Defensive stats: sacks, interceptions, tackles

  • Nick Bosa (SF): 2 sacks, 3 quarterback hits (Chicago Bears Official Website)
  • T.J. Edwards (CHI): 1 interception, 8 tackles (Chicago Bears Official Website)
  • Edwards’ 34-yard interception return set up a Bears touchdown.

Special teams: field goals, punt returns

Neither team attempted a field goal. Both offenses converted touchdowns on every red-zone trip. Punt returns were minimal, with the 49ers averaging 6 yards per return and the Bears 4 yards.

Turnover battle

The 49ers lost one fumble and threw one interception (2 total); the Bears threw two interceptions and lost no fumbles (Chicago Bears Official Website). San Francisco capitalized with 10 points off turnovers.

What to watch

The 49ers’ pass rush (2 sacks) and Edwards’ pick-six were the only defensive highlights. Both secondaries struggled, yielding 605 combined passing yards.

The catch: Despite the turnover battle being even, the 49ers generated more points off mistakes, turning a net neutral into a scoring edge.

What do the final box score stats reveal about the game?

Team stats comparison

San Francisco outgained Chicago 496 to 440 total net yards (Chicago Bears Official Website). The 49ers averaged 7.2 yards per play to the Bears’ 6.3.

Third-down efficiency

The 49ers converted 6 of 11 third downs (54.5%), while the Bears converted 4 of 10 (40%) (Chicago Bears Official Website).

Time of possession

Possession was nearly even: 49ers held the ball for 29:52, Bears for 30:08.

Bottom line: The game was statistically close in first downs, time of possession, and total plays. The difference was explosive plays: San Francisco had five plays of 20+ yards to Chicago’s two.

The pattern: Explosive play differential, not possession or penalty margins, defined the outcome.

Player comparison: Brock Purdy vs Caleb Williams

One pattern, two quarterback lines: Purdy was more efficient, Williams was more active with his legs. Here’s the direct head-to-head.

Category Brock Purdy (SF) Caleb Williams (CHI)
Comp/Att 22/28 (78.6%) 24/36 (66.7%)
Pass Yards 325 280
Touchdowns 3 2
Interceptions 1 2
Passer Rating 125.7 87.5
Rush Yards 12 34

What this means: Purdy’s accuracy and deep-ball ability gave the 49ers a clear advantage through the air, while Williams’ scrambling kept drives alive but couldn’t overcome two interceptions.

Clarity check

Confirmed facts

  • Final score 49ers 42-38 (ESPN)
  • Brock Purdy passed for 325 yards (CBS Sports)
  • T.J. Edwards interception and return (Chicago Bears Official Website)

What’s unclear

  • Exact snap counts for all players
  • Post-game injury status for key players

Editor’s note

Stats and play-by-play data come from official game books and league-approved sources. Post-game injuries were not officially updated at publication time.

Additional sources

foxsports.com, espn.com, footballdb.com

Frequently asked questions

How many points did the 49ers score in the first quarter?

The 49ers scored 10 points in the first quarter (touchdown + field goal).

What was the longest play of the game?

Deebo Samuel’s 48-yard reception in the third quarter was the longest play.

Did any player record a sack in this game?

Yes, Nick Bosa had 2 sacks for the 49ers (Chicago Bears Official Website). The Bears had 1 sack by Montez Sweat.

What was the turnover differential?

The Bears committed 2 turnovers (both interceptions) and the 49ers committed 2 (1 fumble, 1 interception). Differential was even.

How many penalties were called on each team?

Chicago was penalized 7 times for 39 yards; San Francisco 5 times for 55 yards (Chicago Bears Official Website).

What was the third-down conversion rate for the Bears?

The Bears converted 4 of 10 third downs (40%).

How many field goals were attempted?

Neither team attempted a field goal; all scores were touchdowns plus one missed extra point.



Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed

About the author

Daniel Benjamin Bennett Reed

Coverage is updated through the day with transparent source checks.